No. 18-9421

In Re Ronald D. Veteto

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-05-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts administrative-penalty civil-procedure civil-rights clerk-misconduct due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus mandamus-petition notice-pleading prisoner-litigation prisoner-rights sanctions
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court and Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing Veteto's civil rights claims and petitions for mandamus relief

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : Petition for Writ of Mandamus Comes NOW Ronald D. VETETS, the Pettbvoner pre i heveiy and pefitions thes Sapepme Count for a wrrt mandlamu pursuant fo 285.238 7651 irecting the judges ani eler of the United States Court of Appeal aan Eleventh Crrewit (heres naffer “Eleventh Lrcué SU (as [Name Unknow] Chief Jusige, Shanley Mancus, Gerald B, TIORLAT, Jill A PRYO Rs Robin &, RoseEnBAUM, Beverly B. Marri, ap ellays) uel aes, William He ALBRITTON, f Sink £ juclge, Mreklle ls bee LABAMVA Gray M: Bor ven, magratrate; udoe [ncir. Ale, David Smite, clerk ofraurt, 1th Cin. Dionne S. Youn) in Deputy clerk, tetaljos (idenfitres unknown at this time) and fo the! Clerks Of FRE Ue3, Supreme Courts Seott & Harezsand Jacob Levi ran, to: (1) Recall the mandate and reinsfete appeal NMo.1815061 for reasons given hevecnbelows r , (adinest the distor kj ud 4 Md. Alay fo rulegn Vereros pending motions for [eave bo appeal in forma jPaupens “Tt ig pursuant fo Ruta, Feil App P the For whe i ah E the Bo elfa “ad e(s) culls mvs Fa “A CAAnK: 6 for in eg E y QEUS) PW Eon VETETO’s TEP motion Filecl lin the Eleventh Crrear& withoukundue cfela ane to ovel the adminisbrabors of Eke Alabane Depantnient of Comvechito (“ADoc”) and the S& aie CorcrecGenal Facrlity (“Secce™ Lo unreservedly enforce ETETO?s funda meutel constrfutrone( pial to fhe Meahingfals uf effective access tothe ALABAMA coupnls State and Federal, as ma reperfect! expoundenl hertesudsele ° ° I of (3) rect the Eleventh Ciredst ad all ts distrittcourt to s rey a {neve te The“ nolree pleadins only’? rule, Rule ¥[s), Al [Ri Cv r, wnen enterfaming prisoners 41993 crv rafts achyns, page wifi regarel # Brad When a; el on the Pavson TE gation ReformAct C PLRA*), 28 USC$ tii, and to treat and plead 3strikes penelties as affirrma ve clefensesy as arethe exhauts Ons of adcniniohretive remedses, and remove the disteeF judges from the positve ath veadvoc iasl prs Se “? poker flat me fo Te of cv yal satus of neutral arbiters of justice and fo Cease re. Mineng prisoners to hold foz heh ed pleading standard vbhen fered xy rolleters( mathes. _ (4+) sanction the culpable elenkeS of the Eleventh who whey and male ously obstructed Land roufinuete obstruct} i\VEre 0° effective actess to The Eleventh Cieuck and HLS i Supre mp. Count as move perfectly asseverated here’xbelow, and fo directthese clerk cease dad eles is& abusing Prclioe w . [pee ze pripones ella: _ Henge) Ag igoner appellants, refus; ns to a ; $ 5 Oe ves { te Hees | fiaally responding with efile a ate le sa thas ofes a vg Chie appeals wertheut rinsath i) non-answels and | reps Hagin both the isbrstand goty hile TEP mothe us | lon Ms fing ve notrieand bm oraviel Eleventh Civeur£ Coupts,and ad evs theta! ey ty or Pp f 2 copes of dispost ve ord id men DKS 38 Go 9 fsa pe [s so hie can ACI onor and apply the printiy . _ re He saclay ly the 7) Heuston Reel es @e VETERPOS 3 ached pet itro erks ofthe U.S. Supreme Courk dames) which was Fimel tende ons Wr op Certiorer: lor Me ito sceesfonapile d iresf all Lieveutl ote ws a ni panel maiden bo, , ‘tondeyed/dblivered 4 subnussions ba ed von pstrtt Counts in to Th sed onthe date/ti iste reeproper (enaf The designated p reson empleo tf ae ekey are Ene addresece courts bor er frankarr a cee or deliberately spiteful and tne abit hy Gf tneopep clan’ —f sable fo MA ts n malrcéausreg [HlO mpe wh | via mussed ic uiee eran destrof prise ners ployees from missrous outside the [imite esses of uri ddietion See roa . (ads ug~Ao aii Fresented i. Review | sya Bid the Telson Likina tion Refers f | Rul ooate the notte plead? rraAeb, 2EU80. “ e, 2 {), Fed. (<Cru. F ? P ing only regu iremenF of Sefrae dinar tothe adn penalty of 81915l 7 va similar to fhe administ¥ < hk o 4) araffirmative. w K Weta pleaded ane Te eee regu ine ment, ste ke Nas (ss) VETETO eXem p tne € Defen ifnt(s)? of are penally pursveant tothe ne PBA $1415) wee ney “( ‘ te rus (injur po pouish un ev imminenFelanger i Gavi as Whee} ETETO v.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-11
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Ronald D. Veteto
Ronald D. Veteto — Petitioner
Ronald D. Veteto — Petitioner