No. 18-9423
Tags: appellate-review batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky constitutional-procedure equal-protection harmless-error judicial-review jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strikes prosecutorial-discretion racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals should grant a new trial when it finds that the district court failed to complete all three steps of the Batson analysis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED When a court of appeals finds that a district court, in overruling an objection to the prosecution’s use of peremptory juror strikes, failed to complete all three steps of the analysis laid out in this Court’s opinion in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), and its progeny, what relief should the court of appeals grant?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Ayanna Angle
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent