Whether the testimonial statements of witnesses about forensic testing may be admitted only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED THIS CoueT > 2004 ducis/ou in Crawtord v, Uashinytmy bY US, 36 (2004) clenely Established Hal, puksaant te HE Lon Ppontation Clyust of HE Siutp Andee te the Wwited State Leustitibjon, te testimania | stpteménts of A dECIRANT Who (9 Nor PRESEN £ OR Sor toin( ok Expext festimonial REjORT PAY bE Admitted ito Evidence fork He pukposk of Pho G WE Leuth of Hz mAtler AssERLEA Les] tHE de clAarsANT 16 UNAVAL Labhe AML the defen dT pps had A PRIOR ofportunity to choss EXAMINE Me declaeMT. Five years /ATER, iw Melendez -Dinz v. Hlassachusst:ts, 5597 US, 305 (2009) this €CounT Explicitly REféeted pr claim that the pE. ports And stétemenTs of forensic sclentigds ARE SOME how Excépted Jeory Chat ond 's AWEpUIVELAL PRECEAURA [kale And in Bulleorning vu Meu MEXICg SCY US. 647 (Roll), A mAfority of fais CourT mAdé clear that ChAwtord & prockdurAl gule Is. nol spfisfiéd by providing A deteldavT AN opportunity to ChOSSEXAMINE OWE forENSie Sejentis? About AVeThEk forensic scitwhist & out-of courT fesHmonia/ pEpORT And STAFE MENTE, ‘ t , Siuee tae Supeent lou, 6 Zoot dhecuston FV Conc foed,)? tf GAS BEEN cleAply Lstiblisthid Hie fhe “bestimon/4l strtements of witvessis Abst? peony felt! [rosy be] admittdlonly] whee phe declyeayt Is YMAVAI/ABE, ANd lowly] whee fle defendiwT has bad A pkiok oppoktunity fo choss-ExXAiNE. 2? F4/ US AL 57 (Emphasis) Added). Despite this cleaply ExtabfshEd Rule 5 VhE Ff Liecult CoueT of Appeal Reg hed NG kthEARINg Ex BANE, He Pane/ Iw tis case — RE MyiNG ON A PRIOR PANE] dec fsjo JW CRIN Y. LISAEL , Hb £3 296 (5S Cig 2016 )— concluded that He Couel o 20 deel sion fy 8 atcoming ” Left BREN ThE Possibility that A difteeent pule might Apply ty fhe tes tron af REpoRt ANd statements of sclewdtisds, Specttjep ly x the PANEL concluded phsp © bulleonjyg right petmt?t the STALE to Admit ENE scleutichre testieouia/ ezpop ANA St tert u'ts About A stip fr. tes? Phos “igh pwethee SUNT sf S° 1W9 AS phe ppg Ash, dg SCIEN LH WAS SOM EAOW “ivelve ld] # iM Wr RElEVAnt fest And REporT, On, /o,4 Bul/leort/ng did No Such ting. ZN “AcT, Bu[leent'Ng EXPRESS. ly hE fected HE Noto that PE te i Conteontition Clause might AlowOnE sti/Ewhist Jo Act AS A SurkosAate witness tok Adothepe selaufise oo pukof cougt test{monjal SAtéments, To We Extewt phat “fe scopt of phe Bulleomlyne holding ir A SUeStOON tat AAs poiled federAl courts,” Op8, this is MU& Almost entipsly to Justice Soto mAyor’s Concur RING Op iNioN» BUE AS discussed below, Tas fleE Sotertyes CONEUREIRG OPINION did! Not StAtE oR Limit Phe hold! /W Bulleorifug. Nee did YL crcthe At ERCEp tion 79° Cendterd: 5 clenrhy Established pul, | OW Lettie Fok REHEAGINS EN BANC fefoez Sadyes ReAvley, ElRod, And Mjsgison, Ceeu/f Tales fee Gurians TeeAtivg th Petition tok keheat/g EN bance As A Petition foe pel keh EAL, the /Ep AN toe [yal REHEARING Is LDewled/« Ns mErtbLe of fe PAN f Nok judge Iw kegulie Active SERVICE of Phe courT hail Reguested Phat the cok? pe polled, on REAEAR [NG Ew BANG Crd. k Apo. h And St Cp. B af), ThE Petitions toe kehesring Ed bywe is Denied, U/39/29/9. Desplh: the Apparent clarity of the Rule EStAblished jst Cadwtord v. Washington, £41 US. 36 (2004) Aud Applied iN Me fendez-Diaz y. massachusetts, $7, Us 308 (2009) 4urd Bulleoming %» Mew Mexito, $64 US L47(201), ji1 THE Fi Gecuifs déeisiow -whjeh gttects A REN Among Fedeed( Add SlAlE Apaellate cougps AS thty tWwheepprt and Anply Bulleomiwg And Liatoed's clearly established pulty ~ this fue Fo Mowinsg frestie NS £ CO) Which sciéwhtre kéports ace -EstimeniAl, ANA WhithER the Stile CAN EVAdE PRE keguige mente | ot HE Couteolbatjvous CLAUSE LY iW'Hep due/g SCEV I $l RE. peets fee some PURSE ofbER Pan fer Ye uth of he matters Assek fed! Set, fu, UilippasV, ZL pwois, 567 US. £0 (A012). Buf whew ~ Asi HIS: CASE A SCN A sf, te RE poe? And, SA #VEM« EWI — ARE CA) be stimon/y |, ANA (8) [Wteoductid Jae ThE tauth of the matheps ASSEREA, Leawtoed sud Bulleomiug paAhé clene that lhe seensed ¢ hight Is fo be Col t