No. 18-9431
William Maurice Smith v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-justice-reform criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-retroactivity,sentencing-reform drug-distribution due-process first-step-act griffith-v-kentucky ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-review resentencing retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, (1987) apply to First Step Act of 2018?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : cnN
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-08-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2019.
2019-08-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 29, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-30
Response Requested. (Due August 29, 2019)
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Application (18A1220) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 30, 2019.
2019-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2019)
2019-04-10
Application (18A1220) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 15, 2019 to May 30, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Maurice Smith
William Maurice Smith — Petitioner