No. 18-9432
Joseph Frank Rowe v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-2113 18-usc-924 bank-robbery categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law elements-clause federal-bank-robbery sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
Takings HabeasCorpus
Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) or U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(1), where the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Can federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) or U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(1), where the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? . i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Joseph Frank Rowe
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent