Whether the District Court deprived Petitioner of his right to confront witnesses

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the District Court deprived Petitioner of his right to confront witnesses by limiting defense counsel's opportunity to cross-examine the government’s witnesses. 2. Whether the District Court erred in denying Petitioner’s motion to suppress un-Mirandized statements elicited during custodial interrogation. 3. Whether the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction for possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime and whether the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction for money laundering by concealment. 4, Whether the District Court abused its discretion by admitting “other acts” evidence under Rule 404(b). 5. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by admitting expert witness testimony without satisfying the factors set forth in Daubert.