No. 18-9448
Darren Brady v. Sandra St. Pierre, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: city civil-procedure civil-rights complaint-denial due-process false-arrest government government-immunity impersonation-of-judges judicial-misconduct state-court-procedure state-law-officials witness-statements
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether impersonation of judges, government, city, state law officials is wrong and should not apply
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS Presented: , 179 impersonation of Judges, Government, city, state law officials {is wrong} (Just to put an 180 American in jail etc.) and claiming immune under RSA 507-B: 2 (2010), RSA 507-B: 4.1V 181 (supp.2018) and RSA 169-c: 31 (2014)} should not apply; 182 (4.E.D.PA.) I'm a (CCVCollege student), and I was raped will you help please. 183 184 185 [x] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. 186 O_O \ 187 } {
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-20
Waiver of right of respondent Sandra St. Pierre to respond filed.
2019-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Sandra St. Pierre
Joshua Hilliard — Maggiotto, Friedman, Feeney & Fraas, PLLC, Respondent
Joshua Hilliard — Maggiotto, Friedman, Feeney & Fraas, PLLC, Respondent