No. 18-9452

In Re Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-05-31
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights clerk-authority clerk-discretion court-of-appeals due-process federal-courts filing-requirements habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis judicial-authority procedural-compliance standing title-28 title-28-usc-1915
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the United States District Court have the authority to gather and review civil service records & complaints to determine whether the party is a person subject to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1915?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Talent ity ot React 2S kee K Ulanse NE Adcta, St Ms. = 933277 dohsa M. en Plaatetiod 810 Fm. 282\ Aierstsvi lle, Fares. PIZ49 ; Raspeudest; Lyle W. Cage Clerk U.S. Court of Appects Boo S. Maastei Place . New Orlecss, LA, 76/30 “Raspoaclasts Xeurr Recleé gear “Distactk nadlez 26. Distnct Couch Westasrns Destact oO Texcd ; Sons fins terre Deersen OSS €. Casac &. CHhAv22 Blech. Rows Das torsid, Teed, YR2AG | “Table 22 Cantents Peg x Delewtity ak Dactiad % Deelax o@ Aarhecttias —— mite Cir CUM &temcan Edacroan tis CUdeuk iv State masse of TRE Gore | ttan sclicteswol Stetem emt t Teeucn Presaoteel 2. DD <sue Ate. | Dees GB Yarteal States Ditech Couch Aove ke he Gather ty be Erect Grell Sereens & Cam plever Tle 28 USO, Secbon (90S corthek first Parvermininss erhether tha ferty %& Qe garseo Suberect G& the Preovuistens el Tith 28 USC, Seeteon 19ts¢ 2 Masus_ Ata. zk. “Dees the CleckK of & Lhoitacd Sbebex Sourt of Approts thease Ee Quthedr hy ks Coosielacr 4A, Gppact cf & Party tselac the, €heee_ Ca SAvkag PLS SMNS Of THtla ZB USC, Sachs 19S xs thoudCoy pree€ Ehet Ehe Povta IS & Perser1 SUbjand Fd Ehe reguccements 68 TH 28 US.6, “9S FS Stotemest ef Facts —_— O38 Reoasesss Pag Graentins beh +t —_——_.3G Prag 2 —_——_———é Vacibhca tow . a = — Cert) fecete 66 Serica _ sid? iv Fueaxn s€ Authetitias . Pag a Gases: Abclul-ebdaacl v. Wa thar, SW Kad 2023 (Mh Cir 1996) _ Devis v. Fechtel, 150 Fi3ch ¥86 OSth Cir, 7998) ——— S Davellv. Delles County, Texas, 2606 WL 3Y¥8762F OND. Te, Dee, | 2006) vd Gulfstream Rerespace Carp, Nv. Meqecomes Corp,, 768 S.2 #, 133 C1983 _ ¥ adlecksos v. Tehases, 7S Fad 2¢h Csth Cir. Zoo?) —_ ¥ ; Tas pocsen Vv. Feclerel Burecuk Prisons, YOO FSupp 2b 76 (D>.4, 220LS Karr. Puckatt, (38 Fadl 321 (92h Cir. (9 8B) g Kacc¥. UsitechStetes District Cours, 6 S.C4. 219 C19763 ¥ Télamoutesv.bequva, S75 #Secl soz! C9%+h Cir. Zo09) ¥ Tih ar ine. v.TMhora burgh, S8¢ Fed 86 Csth vr. 1989 lWUrbec v, Comey, 24% Fi2cl 9 (sth Cir (981 —__——_— ¥ Stat utest Trala 28 U.S.C, SSectiem /451Cay _| Title 28 USC, Seetron 497 HSE Title 28 USC, Sechom 7978 CES -S% wa AS wre ~y7 macd ryp9 Aue wrst p> 84 YAS 4a BID 79K COP prem epee sree Bizam payro ory Soy Say hPL FP 9? SF HP FIP PA ARO VE OY HF se Sy 0 vy go? Fen DB 4775 Prarie? YF TNS lz prenb mw PPpury Soy Ce D NYE POP PY? OF FOP EL GES FOOD 7 97 SE SOP THY? wordy PP 1IPID SIS | ae eae Me PH TFHO ery Psieny, THY DPUPL WMIPY FOU JOCG” yIPP DY FRYVE™ PYQS Pryor YL Lead SI POO YUP praths Sp Ds 779 AO pow aU rSar 3349 sepa VSI KIDZ Wy pPvy wwe Pred SP PEA ¥Ye PD #0 YL YI]DD Ut SP? Cdos16/ Lroyres “VIN BZ >yr2h Pe Gasper WAS TIO ayer ry TO PPR PPT IO API ytgid Ys Ey SH? PP TOD Ps>rS pPreeeg? Wt FI MAOTD YL A OVP2D G9 if 21 NF RP TPM Je Joe DIAS PRT] AY Testo YR oF LASIDEFOS RWIAPS TCD ere) 45°) vy Lesy>ri osu VP 344799) Sy? Ssaph HP PPGHIN? POH Sey fe JIRED SPPYS P77? —2¥? SP NAP wy pt OO orev Yt yGS-d LY FP proudeys TeBY SY DOES MAL ST? AYA OPPO? FIP SF PA a) TOY Tr oddly 97 12 °— SPY PAV? PAA IP APBD PF 124 pode Snyyrog Pro PrFrcdvalk WH zo99Y] VII? Monn PYo TAe7 MYT FMA BIOS | WIPO PIMEYT 42POD) Sy? Yre ap Wa} cA TMF SPY LEY WMP YSVTD SPHERES PPV OG? PUD OB V2 Wypowai yy wLA/ PIF FPP? SP 23g DOT Qo Sy Urpowe t YR PE 2277 2M BY? VW PIA DHIAY POWYS OD poy oprrneys wo? Seas ayy 2} FOW PSD Jaor2ey OEP ZF JPe797 ~=YyF Byepernpogoq? F8D sy x IP (sHws povevad ~y49 Fodele SorQeseo sn SPIRELY P2027 BYP Lee FS IOM POH’ NOI DO prewar ob Do elyD waPev Sex Ton ag TYR TONG CF st wb POY a? 929, ey Yoes9 ef Rivr9 yes O87 44 BWIIOA FD 4 oe) SoMa AQF TSAO STH SW IdDINTE) aon oeadte hyo yepnotk bora poe agh 2y7 4¥INOSD AYA FP VAD yt 9 YT? PPIPPFTALIP DI Pry Gyr 2 277. PPeMIAITV ED FOW TON) Sxspor end p12 412 set Oo NN ODDS Ra dus Ley >esrV S/ PO BWVIPICRS BYP AWIZDYD GF tybrs ey2 WEY FEE 3200/2 41905 WF 17 ITE he 69 proeizeg sy pt pre Weyov pn leo ; ASS reel pas S2aClY OD Shrove WE Ae yap 43 OD) YR parr Sry brs reiny FIS 42°97 YZ P2O’HBY/”? SRPaS (PO? 2G? YP AF LSD 97 49 [PINPOS HO p27277I

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)

Attorneys

In Re Kirk W. McBride
Kirk Wayne McBride — Petitioner
Kirk Wayne McBride — Petitioner