No. 18-9454

Daniel Brown v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2019-05-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: aedpa constitutional-challenge constitutional-law constitutional-questions coram-nobis custody error-coram-nobis habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-limitation pcra post-conviction-relief writ-of-error-coram-nobis
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 42 Pa. C.S. § 9542 of the Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) operate under the Antiterroism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) 28 U.S.C. § 2244 as a suspension of the writ of error coram nobis under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), by stripping Pennsylvania State Courts jurisdiction of habeas corpus over constitutional questions, is inadequate and ineffective without substitute to test the legality for persons not in custody for purpose of PCRA under AEDPA one year limitation?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether 42 Pa. C.S. § 9542 of the Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) operate under the Antiterroism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) 28 U.S.C. § 2244 as a suspension of the writ of error coram nobis under 28 U.S.C. §.1651(a), by stripping Pennsylvania State Courts jurisdiction of habeas corpus over constitutional questions, is inadequate and ineffective without substitute to test the legality for : persons not in custody for purpose of PCRA under AEDPA one : year limitation? i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Daniel Brown
Daniel George Brown — Petitioner
Daniel George Brown — Petitioner