Does strict calculation of timeliness after finding of extraordinary circumstances created by a state impediment to filing 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d)(1) equitable tolling violate petitioner's right to due process of law?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i DOES STRICT CALCULATION OF. TIMELINESS AFTER FINDING OF EXTRAORDINARY CURCUNSTANCES CREATED BY A_ STATE IMPEDIMENT TO FILING 28.U.S.C. SECTION 2244(D)(1) EQUITABLE TOLLING VIOLATE PETITIONERS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW? : : IL. : DOES WITHHOLDING OF TAPE RECORDED STATEMENTS TO IMPEACH DIESCRIPTION OF ASSAILANT AND COOPERATION WITH CODEFENDANT VIOLATION OF BRADY V. MARYLAND / VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS 14TH AMENDMENT III. DOES APPELLATE FACT FINDING OF ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF ‘ OFFENSE TO RESOLVE AN AMBIGUOUS JURY VERDICT VIOLATION : OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW UNDER 14 THE AMENDMENT/RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL?? IV. IS AN ALL OR NOTHING VERDICT VIOLATIVE OF DUE PROCESS PRINCIPALS UNDER 14TH AMENDMENT? ae V. DOES WITHHOLDING TAPED RECORDED STATEMENTS OF THE VICTIMS INITIALLY DISTINCT DESCRIPTION AND CO-DEFENDANTS PLEA NEGOTIATION VIOLATE DUE PROCESS?