No. 18-9461
Antonio Tillmon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conviction criminal-evidence criminal-procedure drug-distribution due-process evidence fourth-amendment fourth-circuit-review insufficient-evidence judicial-review right-to-a-fair-trial sufficiency-of-evidence undercover-agent undercover-operations
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming Mr. Tillmon's convictions on certain counts
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that there was sufficient evidence to support Mr. Tillmon’s convictions on Counts 1, 2, 48, and 49? I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by affirming the admission of scripted video evidence suggesting Mr. Tillmon’s participation in an undercover agent’s plan to obtain a gun he could use to commit murder?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio Tillmon
Paul K. Sun Jr. — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent