No. 18-9465
Beth Galloway v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting criminal-intent criminal-law eighth-circuit evidence evidence-sufficiency financial-transaction financial-transactions insurance-fraud judgment-of-acquittal motion-for-acquittal motion-for-new-trial new-trial
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a judgment of acquittal should have been granted
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L WHETHER A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON COUNTS 1 AND 2 BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT MS. GALLOWAY KNEW THAT THE MARTELLE HOUSE WAS INSURED OR THAT MR. PLOWER INTENDED TO MAKEA FRAUDULENT INSURANCE CLAIM? Il. WHETHER A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTE DON COUNT 3 BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT MS. GALLOWAY PARTICIPATED IN THE FINANCIAL TRANSACTION, ie., MR. PLOWER'S WITHDRAWAL OF $10,000 FROM HIS WELLS FARGO ACCOUNT? II. WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SHOULD HAVE FOUND THAT THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING MS. GALLOWAY'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL? 1
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Beth Galloway
Michael Kevin Lahammer — Lahammer Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner
Michael Kevin Lahammer — Lahammer Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent