No. 18-9466

Paulito Govea-San Roman v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: crime-of-violence criminal-law disability senior-victim sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-2l1.2 statutory-interpretation stokeling-precedent stokeling-v-united-states texas-robbery ussg-2l1.2
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Texas offense of robbery by inflicting injury against a senior or disabled victim satisfies the definition of 'crime of violence' under USSG §2L1.2(2015)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, after Stokeling v. United States, U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 544 (2019), the Texas offense of robbery by inflicting injury against a senior or disabled victim satisfies the definition of “crime of violence” found in USSG §2L1.2(2015)? Subsidiary question: whether there is a reasonable probability of relief if the court below were to reconsider its decision in this case in light of Stokeling? ii PARTIES Paulito Govea-San Roman is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Paulito Govea-San Roman
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent