Whether a state court's nunc pro tunc judgment cures a jurisdictional defect in a capital defendant's conviction, and whether the first federal habeas petition challenging the constitutionality of such judgment is 'second or successive' under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when a state court enters a nunc pro tunc judgment to attempt to cure a jurisdictional defect in a capital defendant’s conviction, the first federal habeas petition challenging the constitutionality of such judgment is “second or successive” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b) as interpreted by Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320 (2010)? i