Whether the Nevada District Court erred in denying petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus despite the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the case

No question identified. : wed. 7” ~ gh District toiths 7e4_thaK Och, EWA elt Saetuao, Deobe eee ne A Aude Roo 1082999 | tuo Fax “Ruling _witheosT Applicata 0 —Bapld Jat ictal Bins, sip —eoustsheiouel “Subse yatlere Junidiction” 2U *e aa pisterd touch Add Lacths Ano “Taye Burs cadlural Te Civil im _vahiae Action toucenviar® Actual taneceus Sult_oF gt Dist Corts unteousttchoval “Slbyed” yates tedictionn © * a a Tua There | =, Une 4 lh Aldding Te ls a Sane foul ORDER oF fevense Avo esycnse} #16313 with Te Stost _. Not vist Chad OPP es chinad of Tle Yekits ex Bucats AUD Havin Fall Katowsleye. THst Audepion Peesoet Facts OF Nws, Fits Tat Stwate Bill a 182 Chuphn Bod Was Fitoy ||aah ot _Peinyg Mull Ano Void! SITs oF MEV. Proelupes. Se ee TA te OFNEM SuPzZeue / s of Duel SERVICE ee ral\Violstioad oF se Cowl.” 3h 1 Cont! hint Violation) — OF lus oucttition 6 Attomel ped S vtemclyed 2 ttemdned (Ay DANA PALA z Il : . ~ , i] . f 7 en | _ 4 LISTOF PARTIES So |} { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. | : x All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of * all