No. 18-9480
Gregory Stanley Roberts v. Inservco Insurance Services
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: act-534 administrative-determination administrative-law agency-determination benefits-denial disability-benefits due-process employment-law injury-claim light-duty workers-compensation workplace-injury youth-development-center
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess
ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Insurance Service's denial of Act 534 benefits and light duty work for the petitioner's second injury was proper under the relevant workers' compensation laws and regulations?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The petitioner was injured on three occassions while performing his duties at Bensalem Youth Developement Center. (DPW). The second injury, the agency determined that Workers Compensation Insurance Service should approve Act 534 benefits. At this time light duty work was available. Why did the Insurance Service deny Act 534 and light duty?see
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent Inservco Insurance Services to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Inservco Insurance Services
Louis C. Long — Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP, Respondent
Louis C. Long — Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP, Respondent