No. 18-9489

Aaron J. Bressi v. John Gembic, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: amendment appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals district-court due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-process legal-claims procedural-rules remand standing supervisory-power writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-12-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why the Honorable United States District Court ordered the case closed without granting a 30-day order to amend the complaint

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Cl.) why The Honordble! Untrea States District Court Ordeced the Clerk to Close the Case. without aivin | me a 30 olay order +o amend. Com plain. 4 9 (@)~) why the Honorable United States District Court denied my two motions to amend my complaint because the: Henorable Court Said they were Not sone by following Court rulesy when C Fed. R. Civ F 15@)) States 5 when Justice So requires Sas a Matter of jaw and Free ly gives the Court to amends at any time during the case, up unt! the olay at +rial. . 3) why the United States Couct of Appeals Aid not follow any of the Federal Rules of Civil Proceedure either, and have this case remaned back to the District Court with Beth motions to amend Complaint granted under the. Feoleral Rules.s and Jor remanded back +e District Court with a 30 dlay order granteal allowance To amend Complaint. | .) why the Honorable United States Court of Appeals did hot follow any of +he Feleral Rules of Civi\ Proceedure In my Arqueent / rehearing 5 also Known a5 Appenclix C) atorg with (Exhibits 4Was evidence of areneledl J Complaints that Without a doubt Should of been grene by Both Courts 5 and or amended Complaint that or pf been Filed iF either Court would of granted 30 lays vo ho Soe Which Mow Undler Rule 10 Ca Cb)@) of this Honorable Supreme Court of the United States Should grant ehis weit of Certioraris 5° this Honorable Court can exercise its Supervisory Power OVES This case. Thank ye". ; Gans Br224<

Docket Entries

2019-12-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-10-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Toomey, Peter Kay and Vinny Clausi to respond filed.
2019-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Aaron J. Bressi
Aaron J. Bressi — Petitioner
Aaron J. Bressi — Petitioner
Michael Toomey, Peter Kay and Vinny Clausi
Christine Elizabeth MunionWilliam J. Ferren and Associates, Respondent
Christine Elizabeth MunionWilliam J. Ferren and Associates, Respondent