No. 18-9491
William A. Trudeau, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: acquitted-conduct article-iii constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process further-review procedural-default sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner raised substantial showing of denial of constitutional right
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , ‘ I. WHETHER PETITIONER RAISED SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT ON ISSUE OF WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S CORRECTLY CONCLUDED THAT HIS } Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2013) CLAIM WAS PROCEDURALLY > Po DEFAULTED? II. | WHETHER PETITIONER RAISED SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL. RIGHT ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER ACQUITTED CONDUCT SENTENCING UNDERMINES DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND VIOLATES THE UNITED STATES OONSTITUTION ARTICLE III? "177. WHETHER PETITIONER'S SHOWING IS NOT ONLY SUBSTANTIAL, IT IS SUFFICIENT TO 7 . . FURTHER REVIEW BY THIS COURT? : ea
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-17
Supplemental brief of petitioner William A. Trudeau, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent