No. 18-9492

Valentin Spataru v. Rick Ramsay

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-05-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment battery civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment detention due-process eighth-amendment intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress law-enforcement-detention
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether ~30' transportation to jail in a law-enforcement hyperthermic, 'cooking' car is cruel and unusual punishment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether ~30' transportation to jail in a law-enforcement hyperthermic, “cooking” car is cruel and unusual punishment which the U.S. Const. Amend. VIII prohibits. Similarly, whether the other torturous abuses caused by RR are cruel and unusual punishment: RR's Deputy Kern (DK) did not allow me to pay the fine immediately for me to be not arrested; DK did not let me take my credit card to pay the bail to be released; DK did not let me take my phone to have my friends' numbers to call; RR tortured me during detention in jail too, see par. 4 in the facts below for details. If you do not order RAMSAY (RR) to compensate me for the injuries his employees caused me by the ~30' transportation ; to jail in a hyperthermic, “cooking” car, and the other acts, then he and his employees will continue to torture others too, even though it is battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and against U.S. / : Const. Amend. VIII; thus, they will cause more disabilities, poverty and other social problems; therefore, you will condemn me and others to deadly poverty and disabilities. In conclusion, may local, state or federal law enforcement employees (LEEs) detain and transport accused persons (APs) in an injuringly hot, suffocating vehicle which has no air conditioning and has all windows all the way up; "arrest and detain APs without allowing them to take a credit card and the phone numbers of friends and acquaintances; detain APs in jail without proper nutrition, proper warm clothing, medication, proper mattress, pillow, access to law library, legal counsel. These questions are of great national importance too due to the high number of APs in the USA. : 2. Whether dismissal of my case is against the U.S. Const. Amend. V which guarantees the right to due process. Whether the accused person's plea of no contest which regarded swimming lawfully near his boat -while a local rule allows most swimmers, among which I was, in the public water and forbids, ‘~~ “quite arbitrarily, only some swimming-, accompanied -or notby a withhold of adjudication of guilt, a nevertheless did not establish probable cause for his arrest and detention for trespassing of private __ VALENTIN SPATARU vs R. RAMSAY... = SCOTUS 05/20/19, page ii property while swimming in the public water and did not preclude a challenge of the legality of the arrest and detention by way of a civil suit for false arrest and detention in state or federal courts. Truly, the coastal water is very important to our lives, thus the laws related to it must be obeyed, including their exceptions which unreasonable, biased, prejudiced, discriminating, and abusive Sheriff's Deputies and Judges in Monroe County, FL, USA, did not know or applied. Indeed, USA has 95,439 miles (FL . has 8,436 miles) of coastal water, near which more than 130 million people live — more than 260 million people live within 62 miles of the coast — “[the coastal area] provides recreation, relaxation, and a chance to renew the spirit. A third of all Americans [Lmore than 110 million people,] visit coastal areas each year” -, “approximately 50 per cent of all international tourists travel to coastal areas.” Indeed, no one wants to be arrested and detained for lawful swimming, therefore, my question is of great national importance too. : 2.b. Whether a Court may dismiss a complaint without due process, for failure to appeal a judgment on ~ time, even though a conspiracy group has affected the plaintiff mentally through hyperthermia and other excessive stresses, which impaired the plaintiff's reasoning and understanding of the legal ‘ process; by the dismissal, the Court will affirm the prior and encourage future cruel and undue punishment. The dismissal of the case was in conflict with the decisions of this Court in Hazel-Ailas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U. S. 238, 248, which stated that courts must exercise their equity powers in order to “relieve hardships ... aris[ing] from a hard

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
2019-03-14
Application (18A926) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 18, 2019.
2019-03-11
Application (18A926) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 19, 2019 to May 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Rick Spataru
Valentin Spataru — Petitioner