Lloyd E. Austin, IV v. Bridgitte Amsberry
Why would the petitioner accept a plea agreement to the worst case scenario without being of sound mind?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED () Why Wwenld Khe petitioner except oa Shpulteal Cueks Aviah ger. Plea exgreennent Yo the Worst Cose Sceuerio witout tying ok Wink YL he was in his right mind © @) hy wond the Petthener not he granted oy) ap perk ty the welt Of “Edness ty proceect " ey \iis lawyer iF WA wes Ww Wis Vest avers} te do so 2 Air pare dined | -(8) wn wank Me trick Jey except evidence aes Comd “on pelo os evidence & the wader 12 ik hod wang bh de w Vhe crime (case) ? ‘@ why Ward Pre dustrict Atteney Wn Lane Co. oo! gvesent Oo Luife ad eViderce te MWe Ce Xo Gad fone guilty Umen Unc Uw \nas ate) sulficance dy» car ¢ S) lub didvd -+he dishict oMorney \ave ovens cs prove the Vat gf esewtedh as Vhe wiley Weapon or pet heners ae ty Show ne bnile Lard mM pehhener \nas nang > ce ir Myre cate) ub was used ay evidence fs convict Penhoner &) why didv Vie carts see this wes never & raurdler J Ww \nord Fucks Qrove ris qnuetien , Case , ond 2movy : he neo evidense KH URI ard cor ye wri icss eae Ware wove Ggur Wyerucen Aye men , Wiesner ome Selec.