Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District of Oregon
DueProcess
Issues being raised
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Questions presented on appeal | ‘1. Did the Oregon Court of Appeal’s decision and trial court Multnomah County Circuit Court’s decision erred in ruling the General Judgment in favor of Respondent on Writ of Certiorari Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District of Oregon(TriMet) on construing or applying the law although Petitioner on Writ of Certiorari Linh Thi Minh Tran addressed legal issues already argued in the parties’ briefs, parties’ written , submissions, and sufficient evidences including video cameras, audio, declarations, pictures, diagram, deposition, petitioner Linh Thi Minh : ’ Tran’s medical history records to determine that she is suffering physical health injuries and brain damages by TriMet’s employee bus driver Chris Trapp’s mentally under the influence of medicals, alcohol, drugs, and controlled substances that caused detrimental effect on his perceptions and hindered his ability to drive the bus under proper control and his physical incapable of driving the bus at the time of the bus accident occurred on November 11, 2013? 2. The Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision and Trial Court’s decision erred . in construing or applying the law when TriMet bus driver Chris Trapp PETITIONER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LINH THI MINH TRAN’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OREGON SUPRME COURT CASE NUMBER: $066268, OREGON COURT OF APPEALS CASE NUMBER: A164182, MULTNOMAH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE NUMBER: 15CV30342. Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner pro se, 12542 SE Capella court, Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 | Tel: 503-558-0886|Email: | Page 3 of 51 breached TriMet’s highest degree carrier duty of care to TriMet’s bus passenger Linh Thi Minh Tran and TriMet’s bus driver failure to exercise that duty of care, and that the breach caused Petitioner Linh Thi Minh Tran’s suffers physical health injuries and brain damages on 11/11/2013? | 3. The Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision and Trial Court’s decision erred in construing or applying the law when the bus TriMet driver Chris Trapp was mentally under the influence of medicals, alcohol, drugs, and controlled substances that caused detrimental effect on his perceptions , and hindered his ability to drive the bus under proper control and his physical incapable of driving the bus at the time of the bus accident occurred on November 11, 2013 and Respondent on Writ of Certiorari TriMet admitted before the Trial Court that TriMet did not conduct any screening test of controlled substances or alcohol for the bus driver before gave him to operate bus on 11/11/2013? 4. The Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision and Trial Court’s decision erred in construing or applying the law when the record contains facts that create a plausible inference that the TriMet bus driver Chris Trapp and TriMet’s supervisor Jerry Zornado’ statements were not true, General PETITIONER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LINH THI MINH TRAN’S.PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OREGON SUPRME COURT CASE NUMBER: S066268, OREGON COURT OF APPEALS CASE NUMBER: A164182, MULTNOMAH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE NUMBER: 15CV30342. Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner pro se, 12542 SE Capella court, Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 | Tel: 503-558-0886 | Email: | Page 4 of 51 Judgment and Supplemental Judgment granted in favor of respondent TriMet was inappropriate? 5. The Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision and Trial Court’s decision erred in construing or applying the law when there are still genuine issues as to material facts still exist, and if based upon the trial court record files there were still objectively reasonable juror could return a verdict for the adverse party on the matter that is the subject of the motion for summary judgment pursuant to ORCP 47C? 6. Is this case or questions prese