Deliberate-indifference-to-medical-needs

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : f 1) Reason number one is that the Petitioner did present a Medical Deliberate Indifference cause against the Respondent. : 2) Is it contrary to clearly established laws of other Courts of Appeals to Grant the Respondent's Summary Judgment when on three different occasions she did nothing to assist the Petitioners complaints of Internal Bleeding. 3) Is it contrary to clearly established laws for the District Court to Grant Summary Judgment to the Respondent against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals prior rulings on Deliberate Jani .°: Indifference. ; 4) Is it contrary to clearly established laws for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to allow the Grant of the Respondents Summary Judgment against their own prior rulings. 5) Is it contrary to clearly established laws for the District oe Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to not Grant the Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment when clearly the Respondent failed three times to summon for Medical Assistance : for the Petitioner. ; 6) Is it contrary to clearly established laws when the District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Granted Summary Judgment for the Respondent when the Respondent allowed the Petitioner to have Internal Bleeding on June7,2015 and June '8, 2015 and did nothing to summon for Medical Help. 7) Is it contrary to clearly established laws when the District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals failed to Grant: Petitioners Summary Judgment when the Petitioner presented Triable Issues tha¥a Jury could find in his favor.