No. 18-951
T&T Rock Distribution, LLC v. Rutilio I. Velasco
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion arbitration-agreement civil-procedure court-of-appeals discretionary-review federal-arbitration-act litigation-stay motion-to-compel standard-of-review stay-of-litigation trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
Arbitration TradeSecret HealthPrivacy Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration TradeSecret HealthPrivacy Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to review the denial of a motion to compel arbitration
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court should grant Petitioner’s certiorari for because the Supreme Court of Texas denied Petitioner’s Petition For Review and Motion For Rehearing, which sought review of the opinion that the Waco Court of Appeals found the Trial Court did not abuse its discretion by denying T&T Rock’s Motion To Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation Proceedings and not finding a valid, enforceable arbitration agreement existed under the Federal Arbitration Act?
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent Rutilio I. Velasco to respond filed.
2019-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Rutilio I. Velasco
Carlos Lopez — Queenan Law Firm, P.C., Respondent
T&T Rock Distribution, LLC
Gerard Thomas Fazio — Owen & Fazio, P.C., Petitioner