No. 18-9528

Edward Faye Parks v. Bruno Stolc, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure-standing-due-process-takings-pate civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech standing takings
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its decision

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Le py ce reall toute Pies Ae . DPEABKST OI g FLB (Vi, BOIL fey Var Bhi bg with , Ma . phy iy cwidane , Step 0S yale Fu Vegi gtide'¢ Nite, Qe pd Te Ale. ROVE IIS. Diswweston 7 N@ Ollie lg Vaikiaas 70 CSS CAME LG Cwh, 00 Fyuad frag fipd (WC Pmenolen Vb AO 7207) | , ¥ Cit OF Kayypehls br oK MOG [ut. /508: O05 Jifeae se fee jl Wls — syponted, pcR-e-/Z-7KMC , Cote hace fillies price ) Littd (Hile. ~ae Fee New bole CAM sel Ye Gritty WUktS -afy Bh forded Wwhte The Tog x" pbs VME gn Weg PS le Lessor WK HME Swes Freed W )$'75 yes SL bite, At cel Belk Peel FHA ype. Gb nly ele. Funged JUS, tg Jeg 24! sadbrilng Wwe wes Like, “744 yo fae he. The lessik. 1 (ESUyite & we Ras

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Edward F. Parks
Edward Faye Parks — 195949, Petitioner