No. 18-9528
Edward Faye Parks v. Bruno Stolc, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure-standing-due-process-takings-pate civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech standing takings
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its decision
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Edward F. Parks
Edward Faye Parks — 195949, Petitioner