No. 18-9534
Femi Alexander Mewase v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553a confrontation-clause criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-jury-selection due-process federal-rules-of-evidence jury-selection sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the improper removal of Juror 20
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the improper removal of Juror 20. Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by upholding the admission of evidence in violation of the Confrontation Clause and the Federal Rules of Evidence. Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by imposing a sentence greater than necessary to achieve the goals of sentencing in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-31
Attorneys
Femi Alexander Mewase
Tom Lee Stingley Jr. — Stingley Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner
Tom Lee Stingley Jr. — Stingley Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent