Is it a violation of the Fourth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution where it is clear to every reasonable police officer that an arrest is unlawful where police powers conferred by the State of Nevada of Higher Education Police Officers are expressly limited as stated in Nev. Rev. Stat. 289.350 and that to violate the jurisdictional limitations makes it unlawful and without the prerequisite requirement to have a current inter-local agreement with the county police agency and concealing the misconduct by masquerading the legality of the arrest by making a 16 year old female student the arresting officer on the police report effecting a citizens arrest?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is it a violation of the Fourth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution where it is clear to every reasonable police officer that an arrest is unlawful where police powers conferred by the State of Nevada of Higher Education Police Officers are expressly limited as stated in Nev. Rev. Stat. 289.350 and that to violate the jurisdictional limitations makes it unlawful and without the prerequisite requirement to have a current inter-local agreement with the county police agency and concealing the misconduct by masquerading the legality of the arrest by making a 16 year old female student the arresting officer on the police report effecting a citizens arrest? Is it a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution for Defendant College of Southe Nevada Police Officers to arrest petitioner at his home based on a misdemeanor complaint reported four days earl and without a warrant? Is it a violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution due process where state college official sued in the individual capacity have deprived petitioner property and liberty interest with deliberate indifference by failing to disclose existing video evidence exonerating petitioner of the misdemeanor charges of stalking, student misconduc charges, and Title IX sexual harassment charges? Is it a violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution access to the courts clause for a U.S. District Court to force petitioner to amend a well plead Amended Complaint where the said court materially mistated the facts of case to petitioners’ detriment and without correction by the applicable U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit? Is it a violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution access to the courts clause for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to assign a Nevada Appointed Active Federal Judge and two inactive retired judges with relatively poor characters and have no interest or stake in improving the Constitution by virtue of such inactive status and serve to placate the semblance of a fair panel linked with the Nevada appointee to suppress justice in cases from Las Vegas, Nevada?