Whether the court of appeals erred in failing to construe the appellant's motion under Rule 60(b)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT OF’ APPEALS ERRED IN. FAILING TO CONSTRUE THE APPELLANT'S MOTION UNDER RULE 60 (b) AS AN OBLIGATION BY THE DISTRICT ‘COURT , TO ASSERT JURISDICTION AND RULE ON. THE MERITS. Oe II WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN’ITS APPLICATION OF HOWARD v. KING IN DENYING’ THE APPELLANT RELIEF BASED UPON APPELLANT'S STATUS AS HAVING PROCEEDED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ; LI. WHETHER PROCEDURAL ERRORS IN THE PASSAGE OF ; LEGISLATION BY THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH GIVES | RISE TO A SUBSTANTIVE CLAIM CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE BILL AND ITS ‘APPLICATION. ‘ , tg