No. 18-9543
Lonnie Haney v. Shane Jackson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel Lafler-v-Cooper plea-bargaining plea-offer right-to-counsel time-constraints
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the lower court rulings in direct conflict with the spirit of this Court's holding in Lafler v. Cooper?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ARE THE LOWER COURT RULINGS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE SPIRIT OF THIS COURT’S HOLDING IN LAFLER V. COOPER, WHERE DUE TO EXTERNAL FACTORS, DEFENSE COUNSEL HAD JUST UNDER FIVE MINUTES TO CONVEY A PLEA OFFER TO PETITIONER HANEY?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-05
Waiver of right of respondent Shane Jackson, Warden to respond filed.
2019-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Lonnie Haney
Lonnie Haney — Petitioner
Shane Jackson, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent