No. 18-9545

Robert Hercenberger v. Kathy Proctor

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2019-06-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law discrimination due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment government-policy legal-equality state-action state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where Equal Protection of the laws definition apply for all

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Where Equal Protection of the laws definition apply for all: A phrase in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requiring that states guarantee the same right, privileges, and protection to all citizens. The Equal Protection Clause requires states to treat their citizens equally, and advocates have used it to combat discriminatory laws, policies, and government. The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction “the equal protection of the laws”.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-03
Waiver of right of respondent Kathy Proctor to respond filed.
2018-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Kathy
Sheri C. BrowningBrisbee & Stockton, LLC, Respondent
Sheri C. BrowningBrisbee & Stockton, LLC, Respondent
Robert Hercenberger
Robert Hercenberger — Petitioner
Robert Hercenberger — Petitioner