Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erroneously concluded that Petitioner's Fla. Stat. § 893.13 drug offenses qualify within the ACCA's definition of a 'serious drug offense'

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erroneously concluded in finding Petitioner's Fla. Stat. § 893.13 drug offe nses qualifies within the ACCA's definition of a "serious drug offense" where mens rea is not even : an implied element of the definition of a "serious drug offense" in § 924(e) or § 4B1.2(b), according to their preceidential opinion in United States Vv. Smith, 775 F.3d 1262 (lith Cir. 2014) ? 2. Whether the Gourt should grant certiorari to correct the Eleventh Circuit's clear error in United States v. Smith, that a conviction under a strict liability state drug offense is a proper . . ACCA predictae in conflict with Elonis and McFadden a 3. Whether the Florida offense of resisting an officer with violence is a violent felony for the purposes of the ACCA enhancement ? 4. Whether this case shuld be remanded (GVR) . in light of Franklin v. United States, 17-8401 ? |