Whether a plausible claim for relief was asserted in the plaintiff's amended complaint, and whether tolling the statutes of limitation to file and/or prosecute a cognizable claim for relief from damages is against the legislature's intent

QUESTION PRESENTED The question herein is whether a Plausible Claim For Relief was asserted in the Plaintiff, Jerome L. Grimes’, Amended Complaint, and does Tolling the statutes of limitation of time to : file and/or prosecute a cognizable claim for relief from damages, guarantee that the parties adversely affected by not doing so, would be against the Legislature’s intent, when they created Civil Code of Procedure 335, and 335.1(b), and the supporting safe guards of Federal laws pursuant to the prisoners’ Sixth Amendment Rights To Tolling The Statutes Of Limitation Of Time To File A Tort Claim For Damages, “during, after, and repeat continuous imprisonment hardships”, “indigence towards discovery and prosecution In Pro Se”, and “excusable neglect by litigants’ confusion In Pro Se, Plaintiff Status”. And did the lower courts below erroneously | deny the In Pro Se, Plaintiff his substantial fundamental constitutional rights to Access To Courts, under the Sixth Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution. 28 U.S.C. 1291. Fleisher, 679 F.3d at 120. — when the lower courts held and affirmed that Defamation is not plausible, when a was the victim of theft and Framed-Up as a Criminal Trespasser by the employee, Christopher Shutz, et., al., who Framed-Up the . as a Criminal Trespasser for the sole purpose to carry-out the employees’ illegal grand theft against the plaintiff's personal private valuable confidential property valued at least $10,000.00. At a time that the plaintiff was a | Legal Rental Car PAYING Customers. Considering the District Court in dismissing complaint did not undertake any factfinding or substantial discussion ———~~—--—related to prejudicial conflict of interest, illegal activity, or its severity that resulted in a substantial financial loss to the Federally Protected Constitutional Civil Rights.