Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by the state court proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a : io po tha Attacho okuh State Cotht | phones V roles Dum PROCHSS & fet to Sus Pew Hd beds —Cofte s, Ce # Violadon of les. Comps ANb (0). fet A eK. fork Fite to lif. ; flow (2)whey loth Cot ON hae Mpls ra haat on Cor hee KW talk ot as Aiea, Wwheeh (14 bbe With Cosh, Ca this Coutf” HOME (3) Wheater Petitfener is in Catstody > e S.C OF LaWS oF Tyeatles of The Unite cVolation OF The US. Lensiihalion Bef £a support of /-B Pepositions? Pxhihip-/ 4) wheather Petitioner Suffered the Sfate Court lacked Jurisdiction to give Fetitroner The proper redress 4 fetitioner Seeks, due To the Fact Petitioner was d2pr we OF Life and Gberty without due process of Lauy through — : State Couct p ceed 71957 See Affidavit exhibrt-2 , (5 )wheathee Petitioner suffered Judicial miscon in th Wrong Ful Con Vicon in cose care! qajemaan sock fe the a AW 3,46 ae jin he bock of Dbjeck'on Tr molien ” To Dismissr Ex hibtt-] , Roh Would A distri A ‘ly A District Court AND Appeals Court NOT roll oy ot Suppor’ fand_De Fend QUR U.S. Constitution, ! egiSlature, The State, Govenor WHEN , CThey] Cike [Vou] DY, = AND (ME) WERE: Un DER OATH To ? CD Why oxe we Herz, whereby The pistret Courh AND Crrminal Appeals Court Ape Chilly Tn The. « Violotions OF The LAWS OF The Lande AY Live ln Fthey Hie Stolen 27 Years Pond HOw many MoRE In this she 727 MY CaS€Is NOT qi. Only ONE in Oklahoma Prisond.”~ 2 er