No. 18-9561

In Re Benny Stewart

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-procedure due-process due-process,recusal,probable-cause,felony-prosecut felony-prosecution information judge-recusal judicial-bias judicial-recusal probable-cause prosecutorial-discretion recusal state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the potential for bias and lack of impartiality when a judge makes probable cause determinations and presides over all proceedings in a felony prosecution by information violates due process

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The unconstitutional potential for bias and judge recusal when a ‘ felony is prosecuted by an information under state law when the same judge makes the probable cause determination in search warrant and probable cause determination in prosecution by an information and presides over all pretrial proceedings and trial and sentencing. ¢ The Montana Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the District of Montana has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this court.

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-07
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Benny Stewart
Benny Stewart — Petitioner
Benny Stewart — Petitioner