No. 18-9566

Jason Brady Sain v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2019-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: closing-arguments credibility due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment theory-of-the-case witness-credibility
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner's sixth and fourteenth amendment rights to a fair trial violated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WAS PETITIONER’S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL VIOLATED WHEN THE PROSECUTOR COMMITTED PLAIN AND OBVIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR IN ITS CLOSING ARGUMENTS WHEN THE PROSECUTOR GAVE THE JURY HIS PERSONAL OPINION : THAT (1) PETITIONER WAS A BAD PERSON FOR CALLING CALL HIS 5; YEAR OLD SON TO TESTIFY, (2) THAT PETITIONER’S 5-YEAR-OLD SON WAS NOT A CREDIBLE WITNESS, AND (3) BELITTLED AND RIDICULED PETITIONER’S THEORY OF THE CASE?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Jason Brady Sain
Jason Sain — Petitioner
Jason Sain — Petitioner