No. 18-9567
Daniel De Leon v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process indictment jury-trial reasonable-doubt supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether violations of supervised release require proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether violations of supervised release that require or permit additional imprisonment must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt and placed in the indictment, and subjected to cross-examination? ii PARTIES Daniel De Leon is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-30
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-08-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2019.
2019-08-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 29, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-30
Response Requested. (Due August 29, 2019)
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Daniel De Leon
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent