Whether the denial of petitioner's motion to suppress bullets conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court in violation of petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment right to due process?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED D WHETHER The Denial OF Reririoner Motion To Seppress Bullers Conflicts — with relevenr decisions of this Court in Ysolorion OF Peririoner Foverecath Amendment Right To Due Frocess ? Magy V. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 8} SOBA eee a.) WHETHER Perizioner Sixth and Foye reenn Amendment Consriverional Reohzs were. violated when Jerors were inflvencecl by external Se-rcesy or 2) when an ingviry into The external influences on the very Should have been concwered ? Remmer V. nired Sreges, 347 0.5. 227 £1954)... On ATES, 3) is Peritioner Leerreeath Amendment Consrirerional Righr 7 Doe Process as ve ated when There was insefhevenr eviclence To prove. rhaz Perroner was guilty. beyond a reasonable debr of rhe offense of Second okgree Merckr of Mork | fo ? see In r : rey. See La le Wiashig 397 364 Cay __. ¥ Sy ae 7 2S, 353 4) WHETHER Reririoner fecctecath Amenclmeng Consnirerisnel Right To Due Process Was violored! when there was inset FieleaT eviclence ro prove thar perizionen was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of Second Segree. morder of Amy Faszer . -. . _ io A) WHETHER Peri toner levtreenh Agnendmenr Consrigupional Righr Fo Doe haces was viobred when Sraze rasecorors Commirred misconcheey Soliciring false, 1) peered Testimony from Svare Wirness Amber Morn Ta Contiiew with relevanr decisions of this Cover in Ve Eiino's, 360 w.8, 26479 SCrU73 0959). 8 eee B) WHETHER Reririoner Fourteenth Amendment Constirerional Right To Doe _ ——— acess wos violared-when Sore. Posecenies Commirred miscondoer by Fa‘ hing To Correcr false Testimony from state Witness derecrive Brian Griflith. Ln ConPlicr win relevant cleeisioas of rhis Cour in Mapee Ve Ebhnol's , 360 OS. 264,79 $.C-N73 (45D). Kon t | ADDITIOVAL —— COT. jE PRESENTED. O82 |) WHETHER Reririoner. Facrreerh Amendmem lonsrinrriona, | Righn To. Dee Pcess Ard Sierh Right ~~ To Egual_froeerionof the how.Ahad The. Conbronmatiion Clase a | Was Violated When. Srare fosecctror's lonspined To. Demet tin nm | and _Testiylag Mt APL 000 eae — ——— teal An Ber ToScve The S03) LP Bossier Tine tod | Money.,.2e¢ _Lpembers VS ississiga 1, MOL: ABY, GBS 1 NOBB eee . | b-AD_WHETHER Reritioner..Teal. Artorney:s Denied Re ripen WiS cena ance nnn | Si; th Amendment Right To_Fhtective Asstsrance Of Counsel _—~ _| by _PeviTioneh | bdoshiagron, Wb 8,668 = a ! siilOF DOT a LOCI ALI GY D1 tn ean ee — | Trial Arrowney's, Denied Rerithonet WES sane — sseeh Arendrnenn Right To. Rcrive Assiorance Counsel | Strickland blash ngron, Wb 15,668 )O1Silr.or 0) St 6) WHETHER Seritioner_ His. numenanne | Shih, Amendnem Right To_Eflzcrive Aes‘stonce Of loonsel oe _ .-Conspiriog To, Daprive_Rertrionen The geal. Rrorection Of he Lat me aun ce