No. 18-958
Peter P. Mitrano v. United States, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appeals civil-procedure court-of-appeals custody custody-order due-process family-court family-law federal-courts jurisdiction legal-dismissal new-hampshire ninth-circuit standing
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction
Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit err in affirming the dismissal of this action?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented for Review 1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit err in affirming the dismissal of this action? 2. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit err in affirming the dismissal of the claim that the custody order issued on September 27, 2002 by the Lebanon Family Court, in Lebanon, New Hampshire was void as a matter of law?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2018-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
2018-08-30
Application (18A222) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 19, 2018.
2018-08-20
Application (18A222) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2018 to October 19, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
United States, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent