No. 18-9602
Colby L. Simmons v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admissibility-of-evidence criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process evidence evidence-admission fifth-amendment miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court violate petitioner's Fifth Amendment right as set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1965)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the district court violate petitioner's Fifth Amendment right as set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444, 86 S.Ct 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1965), when it admitted evidence found and pre-warned statements made by petitioner while in a custodial situation into evidence that was the basis cf the jury returning a guilty verdict?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Colby L. Simmons
Colby Simmons — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent