Whether the petitioner's alleged unlimited access to any and all modal and personal data under Florida law violates federal constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DDem Aw Stole Nave unlimited BOsdisbk diacoehiown to ANY & eetrnour O modal & eetrour goalies Unde Flonda ono federal dteértole! DV Acwto Demtok Sool Wal! clascly Stoles* ha alleged Liaw Was to ee 12 US ola & Older oct ss Mo Iv UA Ad. Goes Qetrhone mat Ss Corben? Alo o Petros allorswd to ee crrastd Saar sexwal oteder! predady Ca \s\CohOAN & Qetrhoner goalrhes Urded stale adAedenl ia oust O825 a inaciotale canine) Daawaround —to Aa peter D UWA Ire 1S FO CALLS Umat Qoalthes under eobr chole ad feared colmaS ad wna anil cose Umat molds ten Some — 2xoet OWINGS ow id Ab getthonir int west codiaate? ADoIS pebtour qoalfy onder 42 SCS MLM 42 OS.c.S5EAULA HL WGS.C-1S WLI ond A. Stal. 5943, O4ATYCDLA.OA ¢ CA soot nodes mat codisia unde Fl. Dhel. 9 S04 Lda) by law Jmots son on Ane tac. of Ja cecencd®