How does the lower courts rigorously determine if a factual allegation is baseless or frivolous when there is no argument in fact or law to dispute the factual allegation?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED How does the lower courts rigorously determine if a factual allegation is baseless or frivolous when there is no argument in fact or law to dispute the factual allegation? Should the Appeal Court use the abuse of discretion or de novo analysis when reviewing cases dismissed sua sponte as frivolous when there are no argument in fact or law to dispute the factual allegation? Oo ii a , | . e