Whether the grand jury's indictment for cocaine base and the jury's instruction that it did not matter whether it was cocaine base or cocaine, which resulted in a judgment for cocaine base, violated the constitutional rights to a grand jury indictment and due process

QUESTION PRESENTED Where the grand jury alleged cocaine base and the jury was instructed that it didn’t matter whether it was cocaine base or cocaine and the judgment says cocaine base, does this circumvent the democratic constraints and procedural safeguards guaranteed by the Constitution including the right to a grand jury indictment and Due Process?