Whether the courts have abridged the defendant's 14th Amendment due-process, equal-protection rights by disregarding evidence and barring appellate relief

QUESTIONS PRESENTED PREFACE: In tkis case Defendant argues tke Plaintiff refused mortgage ; payments from Defendants wife tren came after tle Defendant for tle Money. , Tre Defendant presented tke payment evidence and tke Court ruled in favor . of tre Plaintiff claiming the evidence was never presented. Defendant appealed but was systematically berred from appellate relief because fe could not pay court fees due to inappropriate interference by tle incursion of pre-trial freezing of Defendants untainted essets as a criminal defendant effected Defendants poverty. Defendant is barred from accessing tke court wlick froze Fis assets by inappropriate actions of its Clerk. 18-6693 Tle case was Removed then frivolously dismissed. Defendant was forced to — Bankrupt (Intra. 18-1476(USCA4)) tke property. QUESTION 1) Wither Fave tke courts by disregarding Defendants evidence and barring tis relief tkrougk appeal abridged tis 14tk Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Rigk ts? QUESTION 2) Has tke indigent Defendant been subjected to a process wkicl is required of indigent defendant and. not of non-indigent defendant, being invidiously discriminatory and violative of Equal Protection guaranteed by tke 14tk Amendment of tke U.S. Constitution? coy int 18-6693