No. 18-9629
Matthew Hale v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process first-amendment free-exercise-clause free-speech religious-freedom religious-freedom-restoration-act standing
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether the Tenth Circuit's usage of a factor-driven test for determining whether a particular belief system qualifies as a 'religious' group for purposes of the First Amendment's free exercise clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is violative of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the holdings in this Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED wheter the Tes Circuit's usage gf a factordrive test or determiaing wheter A particular belief syste gualifies 45 , A "“elgiat Gyr pup ses re te Fist Aucducrt yee exerast clause ad Religions cryedon Qestoraher Act 18 Vidletve of Te First Auvrduect + He Constrehea of te lbited Stes and +e haldvags rt His Souk |
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent Bureau of Prisons to respond filed.
2019-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Bureau of Prisons
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent