ISSUE NO ONE AND TWO whether the United States District court and the Fifth Circuit court of appeals have denied Petitioner his rights to challenge the Government conviction for murder and 30 year sentence for murder, when denying Petitioner relief of a first successive application for cha11en4ng said conviction of the government, denying a COA Certificate of Appealability for appealing the governments alleged conviction. And or denying Petitioner to challenge any lesser offense of the actual conviction and/or trial of the lesser offense indicted for.

ISSUE NO THREE. Whether the lower habeas courts and the fifth circuit court of appeals have errored in not appointing counsel to represent Private man Destyn David Frederick for challenging the government alleged conviction against him in Legal Fiction name DESTYN DAVID FREDERICK. A Private man who is unrepresented and cannot pursue Pro se for fairly challen ging a government conviction against him, unless authorization by the courts or appointment of counsel.

ISSUE NO. FOUR. Whether the lower habeas courts and the Fifth Circuit court of appeals- have errored in not reversing his alleged conviction after direct appeal, Ordering a new trial or new sentencing trial on True-bill reversal he was entitled to after direct appeal, whether the State habeas court and the federal habeas court have denied petitioner his rights for relief clearly demonstrated in first successive State and Federal applications. Whether the Fifth Circuit court of appeals has errored in not authorizing a Certificate of appealability COA, and appointing counsel in the cause.

ISSUE NO. FIVE. Whether all the above issues presented clealy demonstrate violation of Petitioners constitutional rights, and Deprivation of challen ging the government conviction depriving the Petitioner a private man to the writ of habeas corpus for proceeding pro se in the challenge of the government conviction against him in legal fiction name DESTYN DAVID FREDERICK, while lower habeas courts and court of appeals issue orders denying the private man relief. And imprisoning him in violation of the U.S.Cdnstitution depriving the private man of his Liberty and to challenge the gpovernrnent conviction by the Writ of Habeas Corpus the main purpose of the writ of habeas corpus And Whether such actions are in violations of the 1st and 8th Amendment of Right to petition the government in redress of grievances and against Cruel and nunusual punishment.

Whether the United States District court and the Fifth Circuit court of appeals have denied Petitioner his rights to challenge the Government conviction for murder and 30 year sentence for murder, when denying Petitioner relief of a first successive application for challenging said conviction of the government, denying a COA Certificate of Appealability for appealing the governments alleged conviction, and/or denying Petitioner to challenge any lesser offense of the actual conviction and/or trial of the lesser offense indicted for