No. 18-9641

Clifford Brigham v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-maximum substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether imposition of the statutory maximum, 60-month term was substantively unreasonable

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether imposition of the statutory maximum, 60-month term was substantively unreasonable. --prefix-

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Clifford Brigham
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent