No. 18-9650

Shawn Pinson v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2019-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment standing testimony
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When be Bate Krouingt, used Se benany, a was, bogan be

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When be Bate Krouingt, used Se benany, a was, bogan be Faloe prioe rial, We dotain.& conviction, were, Rekione «ve tess ids under ‘ Fourteenth dinerdinent the Gaited Motes tonctetution vinlated whore Soe Kate Ywuw ris vig cwver covtacted, re vee os le . t\avened ? TS Ye yea had Yeown te Tver Sis estoy, wes Yrore attarardlde bludlty that tec won ave ao ele nko question his oeitaliy toneening Wis tekimony tat Ve woh 0 tovtasiont \fum as well,

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Shawn Pinson
Shawn Pinson — Petitioner
Shawn Pinson — Petitioner