No. 18-9654
Carl Javan Ross v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment double-jeopardy due-process public-trial public-trial-rights self-incrimination speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the petitioner's 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial violated as well as public trial rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED W ny, 10k fe Pledy tril violated as wel) a3 Puble-trial rights (OliA ff — Was ae q 1014 wel) a8 Public trial rights 3 ras (petitioner) car] fos’ 5th Aymendynent rights Violated ? (de Are 5) G eel st Y — Was eXcesiyp ball and Creel /unusyal Pamish Ment done in fet onenXar) Poss: case 2G S — Wh [Costtioner) Gel Koss’ 9th Prnendrnent rlghts violated? (rights consred b deny ie 6 — Was Cael Ross’ {sp mend ment rights violated 2 (Freedom A sfex,right appa)
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent