No. 18-9658
Eric Daniel Doyle v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing grouping guidelines judicial-discretion legal-calculation procedural-error sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-maximum total-punishment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process requires the correct calculation of Doyle's Guidelines sentencing range
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether due process requires the correct calculation of Doyle’s Guidelines sentencing range. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric Daniel Doyle
Andrew J. Nelson — Federal Defenders of Montana - Missoula, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent