No. 18-9675

Tommy Dean Bullcoming v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights credibility-determination de-novo-review due-process evidence law-enforcement-testimony qualified-immunity scott-v-harris standard-of-review summary-judgment video-evidence
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court's credibility determination?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Question Presented for Review Expressed in the Terms and Circumstances of the Case. As recognized in Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court’s credibility determination. 1 (b) List of all

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Tommy Bullcoming
Kyle Edward WackenheimOffice of the Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Oklahoma, Petitioner
Kyle Edward WackenheimOffice of the Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Oklahoma, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent