No. 18-9675
Tommy Dean Bullcoming v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights credibility-determination de-novo-review due-process evidence law-enforcement-testimony qualified-immunity scott-v-harris standard-of-review summary-judgment video-evidence
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court's credibility determination?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented for Review Expressed in the Terms and Circumstances of the Case. As recognized in Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court’s credibility determination. 1 (b) List of all
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Tommy Bullcoming
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent