No. 18-9678
Binika L. Hankton v. Frederick Boutte, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,evidence,jackson-v- evidence evidence-sufficiency fifth-amendment fourth-amendment jackson-v-virginia sixth-amendment standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is a conviction constitutionally suspect when the evidence used to convict does not meet the standards of Jackson?
2. Is a conviction constitutionally suspect when an alleged offender's family name creates undue biased?
3. Is a conviction constitutionally sound when the accused has not been afforded her Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a conviction constitutionally suspect when the evidence used to convict does not meet the standards of Jackson?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent Frederick Boutte to respond filed.
2019-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Binika L. Hankton
Binika L. Hankton — Petitioner