No. 18-9678
Binika L. Hankton v. Frederick Boutte, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,evidence,jackson-v- evidence evidence-sufficiency fifth-amendment fourth-amendment jackson-v-virginia sixth-amendment standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a conviction constitutionally suspect when the evidence used to convict does not meet the standards of Jackson?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is aconviction constitutionally suspect when the evidence used to convict does not meet the standards of Jackson? ; Please see page [11]. 2. Is a conviction constitutionally suspect when an alleged offender's family name creates undue biased? Please see page [12] 3. Is a conviction constitutionally sound when the accused has not been afforded her Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights? Please see page [12] [2]
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent Frederick Boutte to respond filed.
2019-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Binika L. Hankton
Binika L. Hankton — Petitioner